Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:

> The POV-Team is (and has been for a long time) well aware of the situation.
> However, note that hosting the site does not mean Chris Cason (POV-Team
> server admin) can just "take away" IRTC from the current IRTC operators, or
> take any other "quick" action. Basically, the issue is political, and I
> strongly suspect that if you get a very sizable number of past IRTC
> submitters (and in particular winners) to support your cause, you are most
> likely to succeed.

>  Thorsten


Thanks for your insight Thorsten.

As Thorsten points out, the more people who express their concerns, the more
likely it is for something to be done.

So what could be the next step? Should we try to collect a list of IRTC
submitters (winners or not) who are sharing our concerns and are willing to
support the continuity of the IRTC?

What is the easiest way to create a list? Is it possible to do this here on
the newsgroups, by starting a new thread asking everybody to write a few
comments and their full name/IRTC name?

Or should somebody write one statement for all, then collecting signatures?
Is it somehow possible to make more submitters aware of this?



statement? How can this be implemented, that is, the collection of names?

Or should we encourage people to e-mail their thoughts en masse to the
Pov-team/IRTC admins? I think that would be more annoying than effective. I



Or maybe somebody else has some other suggestions?

Hildur

Post a reply to this message